Claim your seat
BIZNIZ! fight poster from SmartOnX: Dr. Ryan Dunlop, The BiZ, in the blue corner versus Dr. Gerald Niznick, The NiZ, in the red corner. The Ultimate Implant Debate.
SmartOnX presents

Two philosophies. Twelve rounds.You decide.

Dr. Ryan Dunlop and Dr. Gerald Niznick go twelve rounds on full-arch fixed treatment. Watch the live premiere and score every round as it happens, or watch on demand afterward.

Fight Night live premiere · Date to be announced
Claim your seat at ringsideI'm already registered
Ideas. Evidence. No filter.
The BiZ vs. The NiZ · The Ultimate Implant Debate
Blue corner

Dr. Ryan Dunlop

“The BiZ”
Angulation
Tilted implants
Crestal position
Subcrestal placement
Credentials
DMD, Harvard School of Dental Medicine · Founder & CEO, Full Arch Masters · International lecturer
Full bio

Dr. Ryan Dunlop is a Harvard-trained dentist, implant clinician, educator, and pioneer in digital full-arch reconstruction. After graduating from Harvard School of Dental Medicine in 2006, he completed two years of postgraduate training in New York City before establishing his career in Fresno, California.

As the founder and CEO of Full Arch Masters, Dr. Dunlop has helped educate thousands of dental professionals in advanced implant surgery, digital workflows, and full-arch prosthetic rehabilitation. His clinical approach incorporates technologies such as photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, CAD/CAM, and 3D printing to streamline treatment and facilitate same-day full-arch restorations.

An internationally recognized lecturer, Dr. Dunlop combines extensive clinical experience with a passion for innovation and education.

Representing the Blue Corner as “The BiZ,” Dr. Dunlop enters the SmartOnX BIZNIZ! Championship Debate to defend tilted implant placement, subcrestal positioning, and contemporary approaches to full-arch reconstruction against Dr. Gerald Niznick's more traditional implant philosophy.

Twelve rounds. Two philosophies. The audience decides.

Red corner

Dr. Gerald Niznick

“The NiZ”
Angulation
Straight implants
Crestal position
Supracrestal placement
Credentials
DMD, MSD · Prosthodontist · Founder, Core-Vent, Implant Direct & Paragon Implant Company · 30+ U.S. implant patents
Full bio

Dr. Gerald Niznick is one of the most influential innovators in the history of modern dental implantology. A prosthodontist, inventor, entrepreneur, and educator, Dr. Niznick has spent more than four decades shaping the design, manufacture, and clinical application of dental implants.

After graduating from the University of Manitoba College of Dentistry in 1966, he pursued advanced prosthodontic training at the University of Southern California and earned his master's degree in prosthodontics from Indiana University.

In 1982, Dr. Niznick founded Core-Vent Corporation, launching a series of implant innovations that helped transform implant dentistry. His development of the Screw-Vent implant and its internal conical connection contributed significantly to modern implant design. He subsequently founded Implant Direct, revolutionizing implant distribution through innovative packaging, streamlined manufacturing, and affordable pricing. In 2022, he returned to the industry with Paragon Implant Company, continuing his pursuit of innovative, cost-effective implant systems.

With more than 30 U.S. dental implant patents, numerous professional honors, and a legacy of educating thousands of clinicians worldwide, Dr. Niznick has earned recognition as the “Godfather of American Implant Dentistry.” His contributions were further honored in 2018 when the University of Manitoba named its dental school the Dr. Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry.

Representing the Red Corner as “The NiZ,” Dr. Niznick enters the SmartOnX BIZNIZ! Championship Debate to defend straight implant configurations, supracrestal implant positioning, and the biomechanical and restorative principles underlying his approach to full-arch reconstruction.

Facing Dr. Ryan Dunlop's contemporary tilted-implant philosophy, Dr. Niznick brings decades of engineering innovation, clinical research, and industry experience to a championship confrontation of competing treatment philosophies.

Twelve rounds. Two philosophies. The audience decides.

The fight card

Twelve rounds, one question

Every round helps answer the same question: Which implant philosophy provides the most predictable, maintainable, biologically stable, and prosthetically successful full-arch restoration?

BIZNIZ! fight card poster listing the twelve rounds.
  1. Opening philosophiesThe two primary disagreements, stated plainly.
    01
    Tilted vs. Straight Implants
    Does tilting posterior implants improve full-arch biomechanics and anatomical utilization, or introduce unnecessary complexity?
    Dunlop opens
    02
    Subcrestal vs. Supracrestal Placement
    Where should the implant platform be positioned to maximize crestal bone stability, soft-tissue health, and long-term restorative access?
    Niznick opens
  2. Biological & engineering evidenceSurface design, connections, bone stability, load distribution and fixation.
    03
    Implant Surface: Rough vs. Machined Collar
    Should microtextured surfaces extend to the implant platform, or should the coronal 2–3 mm remain machined to accommodate soft-tissue exposure and potential remodeling?
    Dunlop opens
    04
    Platform Switching and Implant–Abutment Connections
    Which connection geometry and platform relationship best protect marginal bone and minimize mechanical complications?
    Niznick opens
    05
    Crestal Bone Remodeling and Peri-Implantitis
    Do implant depth, collar texture, and exposure to the oral environment meaningfully alter the risk and consequences of peri-implant disease?
    Dunlop opens
    06
    Anterior–Posterior Spread and Cantilevers
    Are tilted posterior implants the best way to increase A–P spread and shorten cantilevers, or can straight implant configurations achieve comparable load distribution?
    Niznick opens
    07
    Implant Length, Diameter, and Primary Stability
    Does maximizing available bone through tilted or longer implants improve fixation, or are shorter, appropriately sized straight implants equally predictable?
    Dunlop opens
  3. Clinical executionAnatomy management, prosthetic design, immediate loading and complications.
    08
    Bone Grafting vs. Anatomical Avoidance
    Is it preferable to graft or augment for ideal straight implant placement, or to tilt implants around the sinus, mental foramen, and other anatomical limitations?
    Niznick opens
    09
    Prosthetic Emergence and Hygiene Access
    How do implant angulation, platform depth, and abutment selection affect restorative contours, cleansability, and maintenance?
    Dunlop opens
    10
    Angled Abutments and Screw-Joint Mechanics
    Do angled multi-unit abutments introduce meaningful mechanical disadvantages, or reliably compensate for tilted implant placement?
    Niznick opens
    11
    Immediate Loading and Full-Arch Conversion
    Which philosophy offers the most predictable immediate provisionalization, passive fit, and stability during early healing?
    Dunlop opens
  4. Championship roundBoth fighters defend their approach against the strongest long-term evidence.
    12
    Long-Term Outcomes: The Evidence Verdict
    When survival, marginal bone loss, biological complications, prosthetic maintenance, and total treatment burden are considered, which philosophy is better supported?
    Niznick opens

Fair-fight note: these approaches aren't always mutually exclusive. Straight implants can be placed subcrestally and tilted implants can have supracrestal platforms, and surface texture, connection design and bone remodeling depend on many factors. The moderator will press each fighter to separate evidence from preference and from implant-system claims.

House rules

How a ringside judge scores the fight

Every round

A moderator intro, a 2-minute opening from each fighter, then a 1-minute rebuttal from each. The fighters take turns going first.

10-point must

The round winner gets 10. The other fighter gets 9 for a close round or 8 for a decisive one.

10–10 even10–9 close10–8 decisive

Score the arguments

Judge evidence, clarity, rebuttals and clinical relevance. Your vote rates the debate, not the science.

Fight Night live

At the live premiere, each scorecard opens for 45 seconds after the rebuttals. Every round's points are announced live. The Live Showing Champion is revealed at the final bell.

On demand

After the premiere, watch anytime. Each round's scorecard unlocks once you've watched that round.

One judge, one card

Your scores save as a draft. Submit once all 12 rounds are scored. A submitted card is final and counts toward the official championship.

Free access · Live and on demand

Claim your seat at ringside

Register once. We'll email you a personal sign-in link, so there's no password to remember or share.

  • The Fight Night live premiere with live round scoring
  • The full 12-round debate on demand, with captions
  • Your own official judge's scorecard

Already registered? .

SmartOnX presents BIZNIZ!Audience votes assess arguments, not scientific truth.